http://blogs.birminghammail.net/editorschair/

A little word re Post Office closures to the Labour Government...

By Steve Dyson on Aug 16, 08 03:50 PM

Just in case the Post Office or Government think we've forgotten about our campaign to make them reconsider the closure programme with proper, reasonably-timed consultation, we haven't.

The Birmingham Mail petition has now been delivered both to Number 10 and the Post Office, and while the original 'consultation' is by now due to be over, we've been told to wait until the end of August to find out what the response is.

We won't half kick up a fuss if the opinions of 7,000+ signatories are ignored...

Something like the following will appear in-paper, forever:

'Labour Government 2008 ignored Birmingham: This notice marks that the Labour Government in August 2008 ignored the pleas of thousands of Brummies to have proper, meaningful consultation on the proposed closure of scores of Post Offices in the city. This arrogant act will never be forgotten in Birmingham.'

Let's hope, Mr Brown and watchers, that it doesn't come to that...

We await your response.

4 Comments

Well, don't hold your breath. Campaigning, public meetings with the Post Office, PostWatch regulators and politicians didn't do much during the Spring review of Northern Ireland post offices. Despite local attempts, our local Post Office branch closed its doors for the last time in July and is now gutter and up to let.

Steve Dyson said:

Understood. However, never give up. It's not over 'til, etc... and, if they do still ignore, the statement in the newspaper will be there scroll of shame... forever

Lincoln said:

I'm always amazed the government sits back and takes the blame for so many problems created by the EU. The following was published in the East Anglian Daily Times;

>> There is a continuous stream of media coverage about the battle to save post offices but the great elephant in the room, the role of the European Union, is mysteriously never mentioned.


Did you know that the government has to go to the European Commission, cap in hand, for permission to subsidise the Post Office? Since 2003, the Commission has frozen the subsidy the government can pay to cover the loss-making parts of the service, like small local post offices in urban and rural areas, at £150 million per annum.

On 29th November 2007, the Commission authorised the government’s public funding plans for the Post Office for the period 1st April 2008 to 31st March 2011. It is a total package of £634 million but the amount to cover the loss-making part of the operation remains frozen at £150 million per annum. The rest of the money must be used to fund a loan facility so that cash services at counters can be provided and to cover the cost of the government’s closure programme.

It is clear that the British government is no longer in control and neither is Royal Mail, though both take the flack, when closures are announced. The reality is that because it has frozen the annual £150 million subsidy for so long, the European Commission is responsible for post office closures. With inflation, the subsidy becomes worth less each year, so more post offices have to close.

I have considerable concern about the new proposals from Essex County Council and other local authorities, who are looking at taking over post offices from Royal Mail. Will the EU approve of this arrangement? It constitutes state aid and will presumably be over and above the package agreed with Brussels. We don’t want to spend large amounts of public money on setting up council run post offices, only for the EU to say “naughty, naughty you can’t do that.�

You might also like to know that the European Parliament approved the new EU Postal Directive on 31st January 2008, which means that from 1st January 2011, the market in postal delivery must be fully opened up to competition. There will be no more national monopolies like Royal Mail. Parcel and package deliveries are already open to competition but this new ruling will, for the first time, include letters under 50 grams or 1.75 ounces.

This ‘liberalisation’ of the market is dressed up as being of great benefit to the consumer but it really means that competitors will cherry pick the best parts of the Royal Mail service and it will be left with the unprofitable bits, like rural deliveries. Once the Royal Mail is out of the picture, costs to the consumer will inevitably rise and quality may suffer. It is time for a reality check in the great Post Office debate. Let’s point the finger in the right direction – Brussels"

I fully support your attemps to save our Post Offices but unfortunately the Birmingham Mail petition was delivered to the wrong address. Westminster no longer runs this country, the EU does.

Paul Burke said:

Time then Steve to follow up with your promise to lead on the Governments failure to stand up for Post Offices.

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

This is to help prevent spamming and confirm you are a human

 

Keep up to date

We read...

Categories

Sponsored Links