http://blogs.birminghammail.net/birminghamcity/

CEO goes

By Colin Tattum on Apr 23, 10 06:42 PM

Michael Dunford's departure came as a genuine surprise.

The chief executive officer had been in the thick of it planning for next season without any apparent indication of what materialised this morning.

He spent time at a local radio station yesterday talking about the future and forthcoming commercial deals.

The other week I was with him for about an hour in his office going through the new season ticket prices and ideas for St Andrew's.

Dunford had all the while cut a good, enthusiastic, capable figure. His football experience was without question and he projected himself and the club well in his dealings with other executives, organisations, the media and supporters.

So what happened?

Blues or Dunford himself won't say anything of substance on, or off, the record. They are bound by a confidentiality agreement.

But something definitely made him decide that it just wasn't working between him and the new owners.

It was described as a 'formal' meeting in Blues statement on the issue, so that suggests matters had suddenly come to a head.

He might have jumped before he was pushed but there is no hard evidence, only hearsay, to suggest such.

Those who have known him down the years in football circles will tell you that he goes by a principle of 'being true to oneself'.

Dunford was well liked by the staff below his senior executive level at St Andrew's and Alex McLeish told the media at his pre-match briefing today that they got on well.

He was what you might term 'old school', learning the ropes in the days of Brian Clough at Derby County. One of the first things he did was to tell St Andrew's male staff that collar and tie was the required dress code.

It seems rather odd to walk so soon into a job, at a good club doing well in the Premier League, with potentially an exciting future ahead. Plus the fact that he was out of work when he was appointed in October.

I suspect it could well have been a clash of cultures at play, with the Chinese feeling things should be done one way, Dunford in another, more traditional manner.

Recent contract negotiations appear to have been a possible area of disagreement, according to sources. The Seymour Pierce saga was not Dunford's domain, and pre-dated his arrival.

For a CEO, he didn't really have the power Karren Brady possessed in the previous regime. He could have felt somewhat emasculated in the chain of command.

It wasn't what he was used to at previous clubs Derby, Everton and Plymouth Argyle.

Peter Pannu, without doubt, is the big chief for Carson Yeung at St Andrew's. And he's not afraid to be forthright, or outspoken.

Pannu's title - vice chairman executive and finance - tells you that he has the final say.

Apart from Michael Wiseman, who was held over from the previous set-up, Dunford was the only Hong Kong 'outsider' appointed to the Yeung Blues empire.

And it was a sensible move as Yeung and co. were, and still are, naive in the workings of football in this country.

In 1993, David Sullivan, Brady and the Golds didn't have much of a clue at first, they learned and matured as they went along.

That's the kind of process Yeung, Pannu and Vico Hui are going through presently, although they have more of a handle on things than their predecessors did back then, pre the Premier League boom. Brady was only 23 as well.

Brady, incidentally, had a deputy managing director, Peter Day, from Spurs. He didn't last long.

Yeung can be ruthless. Witness his former CEO in Hong Kong, William Chan, who was a key aide during the initial takeover bid. He's nowhere to be seen now.

Sammy Yu seemed to have been shunted sideways from vice chairman football to football consultant too for unspecified reasons.

Dunford's exit points to a marriage that wasn't working and for Blues not only is the timing bad but it is a potentially worrying development.

They need an experienced hand in the ways of the football world here, and with the contacts, administrative and diplomatic skills. They need that kind of help, someone to listen to and take advice from.

It may be that they think they can go their own way now with Pannu as the undisputed fulcrum, as previously it was a more streamlined Sullivan-Brady as the old one-two dynamic that got things done.

Unfortunately the Dunford development has only exacerbated that feeling of negativity towards the Yeung regime from some.

That could just be the natural sceptic in the weary 'seen it all before' Blues fan and, because the Chinese tend to be more secretive and harder to fathom, we could all be doing them a disservice and reading too much into what is an executive personnel change; these things do happen.

Ultimately time will tell, once we are through the summer and into August, that is the time to judge how everything has gone and is going at St Andrew's.

Footnote: Reports that Alex McLeish only has £10m to spend this summer are incorrect. It came from a question about him having only spent about £10m in last summer's transfer window and a misinterpretation arose, during his pre-Villa press conference.


11 Comments

Almajir said:

You have to admit, the timing is absolutely shocking; they could have waited a few weeks for the season to finish; or even until Monday when the derby is over and done with.

Andy1875 said:

The timing is poor who knows what happened? He probably felt he had no option but to leave there and then. Cant see it having any affect on the players or performance Sunday anyway. Just hope they bring someone else in because Dunford seemed to be doing fine and it has put us in the spotlight for the wrong reasons again

peter james said:

I wasn't aware Dunford was due to play for Blues v Villa on Sunday pmsl

Scoobers said:

I love the boards enthusiasm yet actions speak louder than words. A massive thumbs up from me re season tickets prices yet as far as I'm aware has anyone on the playing side at the club since October, whether it be management or players, signed a new deal yet since the takeover ? I appreciate these things drag on at times yet it's fast becoming the time to walk the walk now IMO.

We've had the public ding dong with the old board that now looks to be court bound. Add in the recent SP case and the boards due diligence does not look like the best. The poor PR resulting from both of these could have been avoided.

Now with the Chief Executive leaving suddenly it does nothing to ease some fears. Contract talks and player recruitment should be so far down a certain path by now and whilst I think the players will be unaffected I hope the plans for next season are not affected

richard tyrrell said:

very shocked michael walked,i think there is something fishy going on backstage as i was at the supporters club meetings and he sounded like he wanted to give the us the push it needed to be up their with the top premiership clubs

tired& said:

basically u know nowt then.

Bluesky said:

We as Blues fans should be mentally conditioned to ongoing operational problems at the the club,history confirms this.However the fanfare that heralded in the new regime last October now sounds slighly off tune."We are family" was the catch phrase, "transparity" an often used buzz word.
The "family" wants to know what set of circumstances led to Mr Dunfords apparent resignation,and "transparity" of the future intentions for our club.Enough of "talking the talk".

Bluesky said:

We as Blues fans should be mentally conditioned to ongoing operational problems at the the club,history confirms this.However the fanfare that heralded in the new regime last October now sounds slighly off tune."We are family" was the catch phrase, "transparity" an often used buzz word.
The "family" wants to know what set of circumstances led to Mr Dunfords apparent resignation,and "transparity" of the future intentions for our club.Enough of "talking the talk".

Bluesky said:

We as Blues fans should be mentally conditioned to ongoing operational problems at the the club,history confirms this.However the fanfare that heralded in the new regime last October now sounds slighly off tune."We are family" was the catch phrase, "transparity" an often used buzz word.
The "family" wants to know what set of circumstances led to Mr Dunfords apparent resignation,and "transparity" of the future intentions for our club.Enough of "talking the talk".

webstarblue said:

Tatts, if you spoke to him last week about season ticket prices. Did he mention that block 21 has been recategorised and the majority of ST prices in that block have indeed gone UP? No prior warning or anything, just tried to sneak it in!!!

Johnny Zulu said:

Meybe we shouldnt be fussing so much. Disagreements between board and execs happen at any business. Pannu is the chief exec really and Dunford might have wondered what his role was. Dunford looked as if he was doing a decent job tho. He was more acceptable than the last chief exec! Villa went through about five chief execs haven't they? It happens and as long as it doesnt affect Eck and the players which it shouldnt then let's just move on

Keep up to date

Categories

Sponsored Links