One In
Welcome Steve Sidwell, a player who bossed Villa's midfield and left Barry and co chasing shadows in a 2-0 defeat at Reading in February 2007.
It's been a wasted year at Chelsea.
If his hunger is still there, and there is no reason to suggest £60,000 a week for a year on the subs bench would have dented that too severely, then this is a shrewd piece of business.
I was in Martin O'Neill's office on Monday for an hour or more.
Some things were thrown up in that conversation with regards to the Barry saga which opened my eyes.
At some point I'd like to be able to put some of these pieces of information into print, but now is not the time.
There was much made of Steve Finnan being 'key' to the deal for Barry in a couple of papers. Not true, but Finnan's name has been put forward by Villa as one potential solution.
But take it from me, Martin O'Neill is not prepared to deal on anything less than Villa's terms.
And Villa fans, who despite the Sidwell signing are still a frustrated lot, should take heart from that.
Suffice to say O'Neill is seething. His anger towards Barry's agent Alex Black is venomous to say the least.
And having spoken to Black recently, I sense that the feeling is rather mutual.
I have already spoken of my belief that Barry is not to blame. There have been better talkers at Villa in my ten years of covering them: Merson, James, Delaney, Southgate, Mellberg spring to mind but in terms of a gentleman only Southgate pushes Barry close.
But the whole saga leaves a sour taste.
Two years ago Barry's head was turned by O'Neill's arrival. And from the manager's point of view, every promise he made to Barry- every single one- has been kept.
Villa have risen from 16th to 11th to 6th, Barry has gone from nowhere under Sven to somewhere under the 'great umbrella one' to first choice under Capello.
Few would disagree that Barry really should have reported back for training and kept his head down.
But, as I have said at length in my previous posting, this is a horrid, murky footballing world.
Little that appears in print in the form of a quotation can actually be held up as fact.
"This player wants to stay", or "that player wants to leave", or "there has been no interest in such and such a player and it is nonesense to suggest he could be leaving....".
The truth always lies somewhere inbetween.
Only yesterday did Thomas Sorensen reveal the strength of his fall out with Martin O'Neill who had apparently said to him that he had been a poor keeper for five or six seasons. Brilliant stuff!
And there was me reporting- months before Scott Carson came in- that Sorensen would lose his place and that a new keeper would arrive.
Sorensen- who, interestingly, went out of his way to keep David O'Leary in his job- ridiculed such notions in the Danish media. But a few months later he was not laughing so loudly.
He would have left a lot sooner had his contract not been so unbelievably weighty.
Then there is the Frank Lampard scenario.
The papers are full today of a club in crisis because the new manager says he is staying and then the agent says all is not well.
We are talking about a player being offered a five year contract on around £120,000 a week who still cannot find it within himself to accept.
So where is his love of Chelsea? And yet it is the club who appear to be getting it in the neck.
I'll not disagree that Peter Kenyon deserves it. Every top club has a clutch of glorified accountant-type figures earning mega-bucks, but few have Kenyon's arrogance.
Frank's media profile is a million miles above Barry's at the moment because he plays for Chelsea and because Barry came out into the open to try to push through his move.
Because Frank has not had the bottle to do the same he is still a media darling with the London tabloids.
It is all about money for the player and the agent. It stinks.
Villa will move on.
Every day now my contacts around Villa are throwing up names, some new some old. Some I've never heard of.
It promises to be a fascinating few weeks.
I didn't write anything on John Carew's wish to sign a new deal beyond his two years left at Villa. That story appears to have gone everywhere today but I wrote that story in March after the away game at Arsenal.
What Carew says in public and where he sees his future in private could perhaps be two totally different things- but a press man's job is to get close to the truth by using his own information
Would O'Neill like to negotiate now? Or wait til the last minute like he did with Wilfred Bouma?
Does Carew see his future back in Spain? It's never as simple as: "I want to stay", or a manager saying: "we will hold talks".
Anyway, I'm catching an early flight to Zurich in the morning to be ready to report from their training camp in St Gallen.
The Mail will also have a photographer at both games against FC Wil 1900 and FC Zurich.
I'm told that nearly every hotel room in Zurich is taken because of a Salsa dance festival.
I will be packing some brighlty coloured shirts.
Older/Newer
« One In | View from St Gallen »


im sorry but i couldn't care less about what YOU reported. please don't post egotistigal rants about how great you are. If/When i read your stuff I want facts - no lies, guesses or personal missions. Thankyou.
Hi Bill,
Miss you.
Love always,
G. Rowe
At least you think you're wonderful.
Only £10m bid for Bentley was it? How long did it take you to make that figure up? You carry on in your own deluded world and don't let the facts get in the way of a story.
I second what Richard has said. Congratulations in posting a completely useless artical. I do not care what a "Pressmans job is" and I do not care that you spent an hour cleaning O'Neills office on Monday.
You wouldnt even get a job on Tribal Football!
And dont tell us Villa fans what to think of Barry. We paid his wages and we can think what we want.
Bloody hell Bill what have you done? I actually think your article is pretty good. It gives a different insight from the norm. So why did Dan, Keef, Gary and Richard bother reading this blog? Just seems to be a personal attack and totally pointless. I don't agree with all of Bill reports but the Sun, Mirror and Daily Star are the UK's worst reads compared to other newspapers. Remember the Villa fan killed by the Blues fan after the recent derby game? The Sun wrote an awful story that could have caused a lot of tension in Birmingham.
Barry and his agent caused the latest skirmish and no one else. Mon is trying to protect Villa's interests, as ever.
Anyway guys take a chill pill!
To posters 1 & 3 - there is a difference betwen a story - NEWS that is published and a PERSONAL blog. This is SUPPOSED to be a 'day in the life' type of thing - engage brains please.
hey bill you look a bit like jason donovan. i didn't mind the article, it was a little on the egotistical side though even it was a blog.
I think it's great how all the muppets commenting about how bad they think this blog is must still have read it all before doing so.
Nice one - another 'hit' for the website and another 'hit' for Bill Howell.
Why not clear off and find something that your intellects can cope with - like maybe Zoo or Nuts?
Haha your a joke Bill.
You get your sources of Villa fan sites... '48 hours' for the Sidwell signing.. 2 weeks later he signs.. that gamble didnt pay off.
I remember reading a fan post an article from i think Colombia.. and suddenly the next day you had an exclusive...
Classic Bill... keep thinking your top notch but your laughed at by most fans.
Hi Bill,
Good read, nice to hear a different angle on things.
Look forward to the next one.
Mr Howell, as with D'OL, there is something about villa fans that you need to know. 'We're not fickle, we just don't like you'.
Following on from what Jonah said, it would be very easy for Bill to cut down the level of vitriolic response that these Blogs receive.
Being the Mail's "Man at the Villa", its not unreasonable to expect that Bill would put a more positive slant on his reporting. However, in my opinion, Bill Howell has a habit of taking a small grievance, making it personal, and beginning a crusade to portray Aston Villa in a bad light. The incident with Bill's story about David O'Leary emerging as a "shock candidate" to become the Sunderland manager once Niall Quinn's consortium had finalised their takeover at the Stadium of Light is, to me, rock solid proof of Bill Howell's delight at bringing negative coverage to Aston Villa. His recent reporting of Gareth Barry's ongoing transfer saga, Bill's indignation at Aston Villa daring to question his assertion that Martin O'Neill all but thrown in the towel in his attempts to retain the services of his captain.
Perhaps Bill's (well advertised) allegiance to West Bromwich Albion means that he cannot, in good conscience, be fully impartial or offer some kind of positive bias towards the Villa.
And this, for the Mail's "Man at the Villa", goes a long way to explaining the gleeful anger that manifests itself in the reader's responses on this blog.
Bill, Villa fans don't necessarily want to see you handed your P45. But they would like it if you didn't grimace so much when reporting the good news that comes from B6.